References
- Ahnert, R., Ahnert, S. E., Coleman, C. N., & Weingart, S. B. (2021). The network turn: Changing perspectives in the humanities. Elements in Publishing and Book Culture. Cambridge University Press.
- Antoine-Kolesnik, D. (2010). La physique de l’homme chez Regius: suivi de En quoi le traite de l’Homme de Descartes peut-il etre lu comme un texte materialiste? Mercure du Nord. Les Presses de L’Universite Laval.
- Ariew, R. (2014). Descartes and the first Cartesians. Oxford University Press.
- Armstrong, B. G., & Larminie, V. (2008). Du Moulin, Pierre (1568–1658), reformed minister and religious controversialist. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
- Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
- Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication Society, 12.
- Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. arXiv:0803.0476 [physics.soc-ph].
- Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2014). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, Chapter Analyzing Affiliation Networks. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Brughmans, T., Collar, A., & Coward, F. (2016). The connected past: challenges to network studies in archaeology and history. Oxford University Press.
- Clarke, D., & Bos, E.-J. (2020). Henricus Regius. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2020 edition.
- De la Croix, D., & Duchêne, J. (2021). Scholars and literati at the Mersenne Academy (1635–1648). Repertorium Eruditorum Totius Europae - RETE, 2, 7–12.
- De Valeriola, S. (2021). Can historians trust centrality? Historical network analysis and centrality metrics robustness. Journal of Historical Network Research, 6(1), 85–125.
- De Valeriola, S., Ruffini-Ronzani, N., & Cuvelier, E. (2022). Dealing with the heterogeneity of interpersonal relationships in the middle ages. A multi-layer network approach. Digital Medievalist, 15(1), 1–28.
- Descartes, R. (1976). Descartes’ conversation with Burman. (J. Cottingham, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
- Dijstelberge, P. (1994). De cost en de baet: uitgeven en drukken in Amsterdam rond 1600. Holland: regionaal-historisch tijdschrift, 26(4–5), 217–234.
- Dobre, M. (2022). Cartesianism and experimental philosophy. In D. Jalobeanu & C. T. Wolfe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of early modern philosophy and the sciences (pp. 257–267). Springer International Publishing.
- Düring, M. (2016). How reliable are centrality measures for data collected from fragmentary and heterogeneous historical sources? A case study. In The connected past: Challenges to network studies in archaeology and history. Oxford University Press.
- Easton, P. (2018). Antoine Le Grand. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2018 edition.
- Eisenstein, E. L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press.
- Esteve Del Valle, M. (2022). Homophily and polarization in Twitter political networks: A cross-country analysis. Media and Communication, 10, 81–92.
- Fisher, S. (2014). Pierre Gassendi. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2014 edition.
- Foisneau, L., McKenna, A., & Demonet, M.-L. (2008). Dictionary of seventeenth and seventeenth-century French philosophers: Vols 1 and 2. Thoemmes Press.
- Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
- Garber, D. (2016). Why the scientific revolution wasn’t a scientific revolution, and why it matters. In Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions at fifty: Reflections on a science classic. University of Chicago Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (1995). Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford University Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (2006). The emergence of a scientific culture: Science and the shaping of modernity 1210–1685. Oxford University Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (2010). The collapse of mechanism and the rise of sensibility: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1680–1760. Oxford University Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (2016). The natural and the human: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1739–1841. Oxford University Press.
- Goldsmid, E., & Willems, A. (1885). A complete catalogue of all the publications of the Elzevier presses at Leyden, Amsterdam, the Hague, and Utrecht. Privately Printed.
- Graham, S., Milligan, I., Weingart, S., & Martin, K. (2022). Exploring big historical data: The Historian’s macroscope. World Scientific.
- Grosslight, J. (2013). Small skills, big networks: Marin Mersenne as mathematical intelligencer. History of Science, 51(3), 337–374.
- Hall, R. (1966). The scientific revolution, 1500–1800: The formation of the modern scientific attitude. Beacon Press.
- Hamou, P. (2022). Marin Mersenne. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2022 edition.
- Hatfield, G. (2018). René Descartes. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2018 edition.
- Hotson, H., & Lewis, M. (s.d.). Early modern letters online. Retrieved December 2022, from
http://emlo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk - Hutton, S. (2004). Emilie du Châtelet’s institutions de physique as a document in the history of French Newtonianism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 35(3), 515–531.
- Hutton, S. (2019). Cartesianism in Britain. In The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press.
- Iliffe, R., & Mandelbrote, S. (n.d.). “Books in Newton’s Library.” The Newton Project, AHRC,
https://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/about-us/newton-project - Jacob, M. C. (1977). Newtonianism and the origins of the enlightenment: A reassessment. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 11(1), 1–25.
- Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98679.
- Kerschbaumer, F., von Keyserlingk-Rehbein, L., Stark, M., & Düring, M. (2020). The power of networks. Prospects of historical network research. Routledge.
- Koyré, A. (1957). From the closed world to the infinite universe. The Johns Hopkins Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
- Latapy, M., Magnien, C., & Vecchio, N. D. (2008). Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks, 30(1), 31–48.
- Lavin, M. (2021). Why digital humanists should emphasize situated data over capta. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(2).
- Lemercier, C. (2015). Taking time seriously: How do we deal with change in historical networks? In M. Gamper, L. Reschke, & M. Düring (Eds.), Knoten und Kanten III: Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Geschichts-und Politikforschung (pp. 183–212). transcript Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839427422-006 - Lolordo, A. (2006). Gassendi’s philosophical opponents. In A. LoLordo (Author), Pierre Gassendi and the birth of early modern philosophy (pp. 34–59). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498503.005 - Mandelbrote, S. (2004). Clerke, Gilbert (bap. 1626, d. c. 1697), mathematician and theologian. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
- Nadler, S., Schmaltz, T. M., & Antoine-Mahut, D., Eds. (2019). The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press.
- Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89, 208701.
- Newman, M. E. J. (2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E, 67(2).
- Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
- OED Online (2022). “intelligencer, n.”. Oxford University Press. Web.
- Pacchi, A. (1973). Cartesio in lnghilterra. Da More a Boyle. Ser. Biblioteca di cultura moderna, 750. Laterza.
- Pettegree, A., & der Weduwen, A. (2019). The bookshop of the world. Making and trading books in the Dutch golden age. Yale University Press.
- Petz, C., Ghawi, R., & Pfeffer, J. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of a social network of intellectual history. In 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 340–347.
- Pyle, A. (2000). Dictionary of seventeenth-century British philosophers. Thoemmes Press.
- Raymond, J., & Moxham, N. (2016). News networks in early modern Europe. Brill.
- Regius, H. (1646). Fundamenta physices. L. Elsevier.
- Riva, G. F. (2019). Network analysis of medieval manuscript transmission: Some basic principles and methods. Journal of Historical Network Research, 3(1), 30–49.
- Rivington, C. A. (1984). Early printers to the royal society 1663–1708. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 39(1), 1–27.
- Rossini, P. (2022). The networked origins of Cartesian philosophy and science. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 12, 97–120.
- Russell, B. (1947). History of western philosophy. Unwin Ltd.
- Sangiacomo, A., Tanasescu, R., Donker, S., & Hogenbirk, H. D. (2022a). Mapping the evolution of early modern natural philosophy: corpus collection and authority acknowledgement. Annals of Science, 79(1), 1–39.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2021.1992502 - Sangiacomo, A., Tanasescu, R., Donker, S., & Hogenbirk, H. D. (2022b). Recreating the Network of Early Modern Natural Philosophy. Journal of Historical Network Research 7(1), 33–85.
https://doi.org/10.25517/jhnr.v7i1 - Sargent, R.-M. (1995). The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment. (Ser. Science and its conceptual foundations). University of Chicago Press.
- Schmaltz, T. M. (2016). Early modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French constructions. Oxford University Press.
- Schmaltz, T. M. (2017). Newton and the Cartesians. In The Oxford Handbook of Newton. Oxford University Press.
- Schmaltz, T. M. (2019). The curious case of Henricus Regius. In Nadler, S., Schmaltz,
- Schmaltz, T. M. (2022). Regius, Henricus (pp. 1791–1795). Springer International Publishing.
- Shrum, W., Cheek, N. H. Jr., & Hunter, S. M. D. (1988). Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education, 61(4), 227–239.
- Stern, R. (2020). Martin Luther. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2020 edition.
- Stone, G. (2004). Connor [formerly O’Connor], Bernard (c. 1666–1698), physician and writer on Poland. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
- Sturdy, D. (1995). Science and social status: The members of the académie des sciences, 1666–1750. The Boydell Press.
- Sutton, R. B. (1953). The phrase Libertas Philosophandi. Journal of the History of Ideas, 14(2), 310.
- Tait, L. G. (1955). Pierre du Moulin (1568–1658), Huguenot Theologian. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh].
- The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica (2017). Eclecticism. Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/eclecticism . - Unwin, G., Unwin, P. S., & Tucker, D. H. (2020). History of publishing. Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/publishing . - Valleriani, M., Kräutli, F., Zamani, M., Tejedor, A., Sander, C., Vogl, M., Bertram, S., Funke, G., & Kantz, H. (2019). The emergence of epistemic communities in the sphaera corpus: Mechanisms of knowledge evolution. Journal of Historical Network Research, 3(1), 50–91.
- Valleriani, M., Vogl, M., el Hajj, H., & Pham, K. (2022). The network of early modern printers and its impact on the evolution of scientific knowledge: Automatic detection of awareness relationships. Histories, 2(4), 466–503.
- Van Berkel, K. (1984). Descartes in debat met Voetius. de mislukte introductie van het cartesianisme aan de Utrechtse universiteit (1639–1645). GEWINA/TGGNWT, 7, 4–18.
- Van Bunge, W., Krop, H., Leeuwenburgh, B., Schuurman, P., Van Ruler, H., & Wielema, M. (2003). Dictionary of seventeenth and eighteenth-century Dutch philosophers: Vols 1 and 2. Thoemmes Press.
- Van Bunge, W., Krop, H., Steenbakkers, P., & Van de Ven, J. M. (2014). The Bloomsbury companion to Spinoza. Bloomsbury Companions. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Van Vugt, I. (2017). Using multi-layered networks to disclose books in the republic of letters. Journal of Historical Network Research, 1(1), 25–51.
- Vasques Filho, D., & O’Neal, D. R. J. (2020). Transitivity and degree assortativity explained: The bipartite structure of social networks. Physical Review. E, 101, 052305.
- Vasques Filho, D., & O’Neale, D. R. J. (2018). Degree distributions of bipartite networks and their projections. Physical Review. E, 98, 022307.
- Verbeek, T. (1988). La querelle d’Utrecht: Rene Descartes et Martin Schoock. Ser. Concours. Impressions nouvelles.
- Verbeek, T. (1992). Descartes and the Dutch: Early reactions to Cartesian philosophy, 1637–1650. Southern Illinois University Press.
- Vialard, A. A. (1884). J.-B. Du Hamel, pretre de l’oratoire, chancelier de l’eglise de Bayeux: le premier secretaire perpetuel de l’Academie des Sciences. G. TeQui.
- Vozár, Z. (2018). Metadata for the middle ages: A network analysis of manuscriptorium.com II. Proceedings at the Historical Network Research Conference 2018.
- Wilson, C. (2008). Epicureanism at the origins of modernity. Online edn, Oxford Academic.
- Yolton, J. W., Price, J. V., & Stephens, J. E. (1999). The dictionary of eighteenth-century British philosophers. Thoemmes Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.031 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 32
Published on: May 18, 2024
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Silvia Donker, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.