Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predictive Characteristics of Co-authorship Networks: Comparing the Unweighted, Weighted, and Bipartite Cases Cover

Predictive Characteristics of Co-authorship Networks: Comparing the Unweighted, Weighted, and Bipartite Cases

By: Raf Guns  
Open Access
|Sep 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Example: Bipartite author-publication network and its corresponding weighted and unweighted co-authorship networks.
Example: Bipartite author-publication network and its corresponding weighted and unweighted co-authorship networks.

Figure 2

Comparison of two definitions of weighted common neighbors.
Comparison of two definitions of weighted common neighbors.

Figure 3

Example network with three paths between u and v.
Example network with three paths between u and v.

Figure 4

Hypothetical example: two cases of author–publication networks.
Hypothetical example: two cases of author–publication networks.

Figure 5

Influence of tuning parameter α on graph distance predictor (UA).
Influence of tuning parameter α on graph distance predictor (UA).

Figure 6

Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, Fmax).
Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, Fmax).

Figure 7

Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, Fmax).
Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, Fmax).

Figure 8

Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, P@20).
Comparison of Katz predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, P@20).

Figure 9

Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, Fmax).
Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, Fmax).

Figure 10

Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, P@20).
Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (UA, P@20).

Figure 11

Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, Fmax).
Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, Fmax).

Figure 12

Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, P@20).
Comparison of rooted PageRank predictor on unweighted, weighted, and bipartite network (INF, P@20).

Descriptive statistics of the two datasets_

UAINF
TrainingNumber of authors1,102397
Number of papers7,5691,118
Average number of papers per author11.94.3
Average number of authors per paper1.71.5
TestNumber of authors1,102397
Number of papers7,9391,069
Average number of papers per author12.84.4
Average number of authors per paper1.81.6

Results for positive stability_

UAINF
FmaxP@20FmaxP@20
Reoccurrence0.590.480.610.48
Reoccurrence with weights0.591.000.610.81
Reoccurrence with author numbers0.550.520.610.57

Results for neighborhood-based predictors (UA)_

UnweightedWeightedBipartite
Common neighborsFmax0.39640.39280.5866
P@20111
CosineFmax0.40250.3970.5865
P@200.14290.09520.7619

Results for neighborhood-based predictors (INF)_

UnweightedWeightedBipartite
Common neighborsFmax0.40910.39350.6109
P@200.85710.57140.8095
CosineFmax0.43320.43050.6217
P@200.04760.04761
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201620 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 78
Submitted on: May 17, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 26, 2016
Published on: Sep 1, 2017
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Raf Guns, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.