References
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert A. (1989a). National publication patterns and citation impact in the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 17(1–2), 11–14.
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989b). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 325–330.
- Campanario, J.M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87, 75–84.
- Frandsen, T.F. (2008). On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journals. Scientometrics, 74, 439–451.
- Garfield, E. (1987). Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Item-by-item audits reveal a diversity of editorial material. Current Contents, 2, 7–13.
- Harzing, A.W. (2010). Working with ISI data: Beware of categorisation problems. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/ISI_categories.htm.
- Harzing, A.W. (2013). Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences? Scientometrics, 94(1), 23–34.
- Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PloS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.
- Kaneiwa, K., Adachi, J., Aoki, M., Masuda, T., Midorikawa, N., Tanimura, A., & Yamazaki, S. (1988). A comparison between the journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 13(3–4), 125–153.
- Lewison, G. (2009). The percentage of reviews in research output: A simple measure of research esteem. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 25–37.
- Michels, C., & Fu, J.Y. (2014). Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science. Scientometrics, 100(2), 307–327.
- Rousseau, R. (2009). The most influential editorials. In In Åström, F., Danell, R., & Larsen, Bl, et al. (Eds.) Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies. A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday (pp. 47–53). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
- Sigogneau, A. (2000). An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding publications recorded in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 47(3), 589–604.
- van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489–498.
- van Leeuwen, T.N., van der Wurff, L.J., & de Craen, A.J.M. (2007). Classification of “research letters” in general medical journals and its consequences in bibliometric research evaluation processes. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 59–63.
- van Leeuwen, T., Costas, R., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. (2013). The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics, 95(2), 817–828.
- Wang, Y.H., Fang, C., Sun, S.J., & Wang, X. (2008). Analysis of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States (PNAS) (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 29(4), 718–722.
- Wang, X.W., Mao, W.L., Xu, S.M., & Zhang, C.B. (2014). Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 98, 1923–1933.
- Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Document-type country profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1403–1411.
- Zuccala, A., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 62, 1979–1991.