System Model of Inclusive Development Management of Rural-Urban Agglomerations of Ukraine

Pavlov, Oleksandr; Pavlova, Iryna; Pavlov-junior, Oleksandr; Pushak, Halyna; Skoryk, Halyna; Lagodiienko, Volodymyr

doi:10.15544/mts.2024.08

Abstract

The reform of decentralization of public power and management, which was carried out in Ukraine by transferring power and resources from central authorities to the level of united territorial communities (UTCs) and districts, makes increased requirements for the management of the process of cohesion and development of these socio-spatial formations on the basis of inclusiveness. Given this, the article substantiates the need to build system management an inclusive development of UTCs and districts identified as convergent type rural-urban agglomerations. The orientation of the redistribution of power and its consequences for the inclusivity of these agglomeration formations was found, the value of this phenomenon was revealed to overcome socio-spatial disproportions, determine the structure and measurements of system model management of inclusive development of these agglomerations. Theoretical generalizations and practical recommendations made according to the results of the study are distinguished by scientific novelty and are important for the post-war restoration of Ukraine.

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Business. 529 р.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batanov, O.V. (2014). Local self-government in the conditions of globalization. Interdisciplinary humanitarian studies. Series “Legal Sciences”, 1: 5–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berdegué, J. A., Carriazo, F., Jara, B., Modrego, F., Soloaga, I. (2015). Cities, Territories, and Inclusive Growth: Unraveling Urban-Rural Linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. World Development, 73: 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borodina, O. M. (2022). The agri-food system of Ukraine in the post-war period should become socially, ecologically and economically sustainable: a demand of civil society. Ukrainian socium, 4 (83): 112–118.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borodina, O. M., Prokopa, I. V. (2018). The future of the Ukraine’s rural sector – from extractive use to inclusive development. Economy of Ukraine, 11–12: 104–121.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hrytsenko, A. A. (2016). Economy of Ukraine on the way to inclusive development. Economics and Forecasting, 2: 9–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huang, D. & Zheng, Q. (2022). Analysis of regional differences in the influence of China’s urbanization modes on rural sustainable development. Frontiers in Environmental Science: Environmental Economics and Management, 10: 1–16. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2022.938897.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Inclusive rural development in Ukraine: monograph (2020); under the editorship doctor habit in economics, professor, corresponding member NAS of Ukraine by O. M. Borodina. Kyiv: SO “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”. 257 р.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kindzers’kyi, Yu. (2020). Policy of inclusive and sustainable industrialization: the challenges and priorities of implementation. Economic analysis, 30 (1, Part 1): 105-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.01.01.105.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krugman P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 156 р.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, W. (2014). Economic Geography for Spatial Governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69: 1109–1116.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maksymchuk, M. V., & Klyoba, S. M. (2019). Intermunicipal cooperation as a tool for increasing the inclusiveness of the development of united territorial communities of Ukraine. Regional economy. 2: 26–35.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayovets, E. Y. Mayovets, Y. M. (2020). Inclusive institutional model of innovative development of agrarian economy. Bulletin of ChNU named after B. Khmelnytskyi. Series “Economic Sciences”, 4: 114–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31651/2076-5843-2020-4-114-122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., Singh, G. (2016). Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment and Urbanization, 28, 1: 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ovaska, U., Vihinen, H., Oostindie, H., Farinós, J., Hrabar, M., Kilis, E., Kobal, J., Tisenkopfs, T., and Vulto, H. (2021). Network Governance Arrangements and Rural-Urban Synergy. Sustainability. 13 (5): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052952.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pavlov, O. I., Pavlova, I. O., Pavlov. O. I.- junior (2022). Institutionalization of the inclusive development of rural-urban agglomerations of Ukraine. Market infrastructure. 68: 50–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct68-9. http://www.market-infr.od.ua/journals/2022/68_2022/11.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reinders, S., Dekker, М., Kesteren, F., Oudenhuijsen, L. (2019). Inclusive Development in Africa. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2983440/view
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Muštra, V. (2022). The economic returns of decentralization: Government quality and the role of space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54 (8): 1604–1622. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221118913.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shantir, M. A. H. (2022). Decentralization and Geographical Inequality in Egypt. Available online: https://www.arab-reform.net/publication/decentralization-and-geographical-inequality-in-egypt/ (accessed on 26 March 2024).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spatial justice in land use and sustainable rural development: in 2 books. Book 1: Equity in access to land resources and benefits from their use o rural territories: monograph (2021); doctor habit in tconomics, professor, corresponding member NAS of Ukraine by O. M. Borodina. Kyiv: SO “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”. 225 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steinberg, F. (2014). Rural-Urban Linkages: an urban perspective. Working Paper Series N° 128. Working Group: Development with Territorial Cohesion. Territorial Cohesion for Development Program. Rimisp, Santiago, Chile. 35 р.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, Y., Bao, W., Wang, Y., Liu, Y. (2021). Measurement of urban-rural integration level and its spatial differentiation in China in the new century. Habitat International, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102420.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ye C., Pan J. & Liu. Z. (2022). The historical logics and geographical patterns of rural-urban governance in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32 (7): 1225–1240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1994-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ye, C., Liu, Z. Rural-urban co-governance: multi-scale practice (2020). Science Bulletin, 65 (10): 778–880. DOI:10.1016/j.scib.2020.02.021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339501397_Rural-urban_co-governance_multi-scale_practice
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou, J. and Yang, F. (2023). Impact of Chinese-Style Fiscal Decentralization on Urban–Rural Integration: Based on Factor Allocation. Sustainability, 15: 1–21. DOI: /10.3390/su15021542.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu, J., Guo, Y. (2022). Social justice in spatial change: transition from autonomous rural development to integrated urbanization in China. Cities, 122 (3): 103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103539.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

System Model of Inclusive Development Management of Rural-Urban Agglomerations of Ukraine

Abstract

Paradigm

My account