References
- Ahmed, U., Naas, P., Evenett, S. J., & Kugler, K. (2024). ChatWTO: An analysis of generative artificial intelligence and international trade [White paper]. World Economic Forum – Global Future Council on International Trade and Investment.
- Anwansedo, F., Gbadebo, A. D., & Akinwande, O. T. (2024). Exploring the role of AI-enhanced online marketplaces in facilitating economic growth: An impact analysis on trade relations between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(6), 1–15. DOI:10.24857/rgsa.v18n6–139
- Babikov, O., Fedorenko, I., Omelchenko, O., Lyseiuk, A., & Panova, O. (2024). The observance of human rights and freedoms during the covert obtaining of information in criminal proceedings. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(4), 197–215. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2024.29.04.12
- Bar, A. (2024). Identyfikacja pochodzenia i znakowanie treści syntetycznych a problem ochrony prawnoautorskiej wytworów powstających z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 3(165), 56–80.
- Bar, A. (2025). Obrazy generowane z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji. Status prawnoautorski. Wolters Kluwer.
- Baran, K. (2024). The right of trade unions to information in the era of the fourth and fifth industrial revolutions. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(2), 29–38. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.03
- Chander, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and trade. In M. Burri (Ed.), Big data and global trade law (pp. 115–127). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108919234.008
- Comunale, M., & Manera, A. (2024). The economic impacts and the regulation of AI: a review of the academic literature and policy actions [Working paper no. 24/65]. International Monetary Fund.
- Congress of the United States of America. (1887). Interstate commerce act. Th e National Archives and Records Administration. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/interstate-commerce-act
- Council of Europe. (2024a). Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, CETS no. 225, 17 May 2024. https://www.ref-world.org/legal/agreements/coeministers/2024/en/148016
- Council of Europe. (2024b). Treaty Offi ce: Chart of Signatures and Ratifications of Treaty 225: Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: CETS no. 225. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=signatures-by-treaty&treatynum=225
- Dempsey, P. S. (2012). The rise and fall of the interstate commerce commission: The tortuous path from regulation to deregulation of America’s infrastructure. Marquette Law Review, 95(4), 1151–1189.
- European Commission. (2023a, 30 October). Commission welcomes G7 leaders’ agreement on guiding principles and a code of conduct on artificial intelligence [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5379
- European Commission. (2023b, 30 October). Hiroshima Process international guiding principles for advanced AI systems [Policy and legislation]. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/hiroshima-process-international-guiding-principles-advanced-ai-system
- European Commission. (2023c, 30 October). Hiroshima Process international code of conduct for advanced AI systems [Policy and legislation]. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/hiroshima-process-international-code-conduct-advanced-ai-systems
- Fonseca Azevedo, M. da (2024). Navigating the AI frontier in international trade law [Working paper series no. 4/2024]. World Trade Institute.
- Gaffar, H., & Albarashdi, S. (2024). Copyright protection for AI-generated works: Exploring originality and ownership in a digital landscape. Asian Journal of International Law, 15, 23–46. DOI:10.1017/S2044251323000735
- Gienas, K. (2024). Trenowanie AI a prawo autorskie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 3(165), 5–55.
- Igbinenikaro, E., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024a). Policy recommendations for integrating artificial intelligence into global trade agreements. International Journal of Engineering Research Updates, 6(1), 1–10. DOI:10.53430/ijeru.2024.6.1.0022
- Igbinenikaro, E., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024b). Navigating the legal complexities of artificial intelligence in global trade agreements. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 488–505. DOI:10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.987
- Jones, E. (2023). Digital disruption: Artificial intelligence and international trade policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39, 70–84. DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grac049
- Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit of 18 March 2025 on the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter, 687 F. Supp. 3d 140 (D. D. C. 2023). https://media.cadc.us-courts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/03/23–5233.pdf
- Judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware of 11 February 2025 on the case of Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et al. v. Ross Intelligence Inc, no. 1:20-cv-00613-SB. https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/20–613_5.pdf
- Kamiński, M. (2024). Podmiot kompetencji administracyjnej w zautomatyzowanych procesach stosowania prawa na tle problematyki legitymacji prawno-demokratycznej delegowania kompetencji na systemy sztucznej inteligencji i odpowiedzialności prawnej za ich działania lub zaniechania. Prawo i Więź, 53(6), 239–263. DOI:10.36128/PRIW.VI53.1102
- Karska, E. (2019). Nowe tendencje w międzynarodowym prawie ochrony praw człowieka jako odpowiedź na zmiany. In A. Tarwacka (Ed.), Tempora Mutantur Cum Legibus. Księga Jubileuszowa z okazji 20-lecia Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie (pp. 48–58). Wolters Kluwer.
- Karska, E. (2021). Drafting an international legally binding instrument on business and human rights: The next step towards strengthening the protection of human rights. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 466–485. DOI:10.1163/18719732–23050004
- Karska, E. (2022). Biznes i prawa człowieka – perspektywa Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. In E. Cała-Wacinkiewicz, J. Menkes, J. Nowakowska-Małusecka, & W. S. Staszewski (Eds.), Stosunki sąsiedzkie w świetle prawa międzynarodowego (pp. 241–253). C. H. Beck.
- Karska, E., & Karski, K. (2021). Special issue editorial. Business and human rights: Legal aspects. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 427–432. DOI:10.1163/18719732–23050001
- Karska, E., & Karski, K. (2023). Current challenges of international and European human rights law: Introductory remarks. International Community Law Review, 25(6), 539–545. DOI:10.1163/18719732-bja10112
- Karski, K., & Ziemblicki, B. (2021). Commercial companies as applicants before the European Court of Human Rights. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 503–525. DOI:10.1163/18719732–23050006
- Khan, A. (2024). The intersection of artificial intelligence and international trade laws: Challenges and opportunities. IIUM Law Journal, 32(1), 104–107. DOI:10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.912
- Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Discrimination in the age of algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10, 113–174. DOI:10.1093/jla/laz001
- Köksal, B., & Sarel, R. (in press). The smart contracts trilemma. University of Illinois Law Review, 1–64. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4689013
- Kowalski, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the future functioning of administrative courts. Prawo i Więź, 53(6), 173–185. DOI:10.36128/PRIW.VI53.988
- Kużelewska, E., & Piekutowska, A. (2023). Belarus’ violation of international obligations in connection with artificial migration pressure on the Belarus–European Union border. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(1), 39–55. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.03
- Lin, C.-F (2021). Public morals, trade secrets, and the dilemma of regulating automated driving systems. In S.-Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 237–254). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.013
- Markiewicz, R. (2023). ChatGPT i prawo autorskie Unii Europejskiej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 2(160), 143–171.
- Méndez, M. L., & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). The presumption of the employment relationship of platform workers as an opportunity to eliminate obstacles arising from competition law in the conclusion of a collective agreement: The example of Spain. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 197–216. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.12
- Meyer, T., Marsden, C., & Brown, I. (2020). Regulating internet content with technology: Analysis of policy initiatives relevant to illegal content and disinformation online in the European Union. In G. Terzis, D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, & D. Trottier (Eds.), Disinformation and digital media as a challenge for democracy (pp. 309–326). Intersentia.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2019). G20 AI principles. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/g20_summit/osaka19/pdf/documents/en/annex_08.pdf
- Nizza, U. (in press). What do AIs think about the AI Act? An experimental analysis of the EU approach on artificial intelligence. European Business Law Review, 36(2), 1–20. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4976521
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Revised recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, adopted on 3 May 2024, C/MIN(2024)16/FINAL. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development https://one.oecd.org/document/C/MIN(2024)16/FINAL/en/pdf
- Peng, S.-Y., Lin, C.-F., & Streinz, T. (2021). Artificial intelligence and international economic law: A research and policy agenda. In S.-Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.002
- Shaffer, G. (2021). Trade law in a data-driven economy: The need for modesty and resilience. In S.- Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 29–53). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.00
- ThankGod, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence and international trade law: Navigating legal challenges in the age of automation. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4706943
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021, 23 November). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence, adopted on 23 November 2021. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (1979). Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (as amended on 28 September 1979) (authentic text), TRT/BERNE/001. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698
- World Trade Organization (WTO). (2017a). General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), Annex 1B. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gats_e.htm
- World Trade Organization (WTO). (2017b). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (as amended on 23 January 2017). Annex 1C. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/31bis_trips_e.pdf