Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Screening of Selected Indicators of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Macedonia Cover

Screening of Selected Indicators of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Macedonia

Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. 1. European Communities (EC) (1976). European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes. Strasbourg, 10.3.1976. European Treaty Series No. 87. www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/ Html/087.htm
  2. 2. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. OJ L 221/23 8.8.98 (July 20, 1998)
  3. 3. Animal welfare and protection law (2007). OJ Republic of Macedonia 113 (September 20, 2007)
  4. 4. Regulation for conditions and methods for protection of farm animals (2009). OJ Republic of Macedonia 140 (November 20, 2009)
  5. 5. European Commission (2007). Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270. Wave 66.1. TNS Opinion and Social http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf
  6. 6. European Commission (2012). Communication from the commission to the European Parlament, the council and the European economic and social committee on the European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012-2015 (Text with EEA relevance), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium
  7. 7. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) (2012). Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6): 2767, 29.
  8. 8. Welfare Quality®, (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands, 180.
  9. 9. State Statistical Office, Skopje - News release (2014). Number of livestock, poultry and beehives in 2013. Skopje, Macedonia. www.statgov.mk
  10. 10. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy (2013). Annual report for agriculture and rural development, 2012. Skopje, Macedonia
  11. 11. Ostojić-Andrić, D., Hristov, S., Novaković, Ž., Pantelić, V., Petrović, M. M., Zlatanović, Z., Nikšić, D. (2011). Dairy cows welfare quality in loose vs tie housing system. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 27 (3): 975-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103975O10.2298/BAH1103975O
  12. 12. Vučemilo, M., Matković, K., Štoković, I., Kovačević, S., Benić, M. (2012). Welfare assessment of dairy cows housed in a tie-stall system. Mljekarstvo 62 (1): 62-67.
  13. 13. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E., Niculae, M., Stefan, R., Sandru, C. (2014). The effect of the housing system on the welfare quality of dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci. 13 (1): 2940. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.294010.4081/ijas.2014.2940
  14. 14. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Sandru, C.D., Stefan, R., Lazar, E. (2010). The welfare assessment of tied dairy cows in 52 small farms in north-eastern Transylvania using animal-based measurements. Slov Vet Res. 47 (3): 77-82.
  15. 15. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Lazar, E.A., Hegedus, I.C. (2009). Assessment of dairy cow welfare in farms from Transylvania. Proceedings of the 44th Croatian and 4th International Symposium on Agriculture. Opatija, Croatia. 2009 Feb 16-20; 752-756.
  16. 16. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E. A., Spinu, M., Groza, I. S., Sandru, C. D. (2013). Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand. 55 (1): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-43 PMid:23724804 ; PMCid:PMC367497210.1186/1751-0147-55-43
  17. 17. Andersson, M., Schaar, J., Wiktorsson, H. (1984). Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci. 11, 599-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-510.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-5
  18. 18. Heath, C., Lin, C., Mullan, S., Browne, W.J., Main, D.C.J. (2014). Implementing Welfare Quality® in UK assurance schemes: evaluating the challenges. Anim Welf. 23 (1): 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.09510.7120/09627286.23.1.095
  19. 19. Regula, G., Danuser, J., Spycher, B., Wechsler, B. (2004). Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med. 66 (1-4): 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.004 PMid:1557934610.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.00415579346
  20. 20. Brenninkmeyer, C., Dippel, S., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Knierim, U. (2013). Hock lesion epidemiology in cubicle housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems and countries. Prev Vet Med. 109 (3-4): 236-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.014 PMid:2317421710.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.01423174217
  21. 21. Zurbrigg, K., Kelton, D., Anderson, N., Millman, S. (2005). Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can Vet J. 46 (10): 902-909. PMid:16454382; PMCid:PMC1255592
  22. 22. Leach, K. A., Dippel, S., Huber, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Whay, H.R. (2009). Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls. J Dairy Sci. 92(4): 1567-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1648 PMid:1930763710.3168/jds.2008-164819307637
  23. 23. Cook, N. (2003). Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 223 (9): 1324-1328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1324 PMid:1462122210.2460/javma.2003.223.132414621222
  24. 24. Wells, S., Trent, A., Marsh, W., Williamson, N., Robinson, R. (1995). Some risk factors associated with clinical lameness in dairy herds in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Vet Rec. 136 (21): 537-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.136.21.537 PMid:766055710.1136/vr.136.21.5377660557
  25. 25. Dippel, S., Dolezal, M., Brenninkmeyer, C., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Knierim, U., Winckler, C. (2009). Risk factors for lameness in cubicle housed Austrian Simmental dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 90 (1-2): 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014 PMid:1940962910.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014
  26. 26. Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G., Hörning, B., Roiha, U., Tosi, M., Waiblinger, S. (2003). Selection of parameters for on-farm welfareassessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Anim Welf. 12 (4): 619-624.
  27. 27. Estep, D.Q., Hetts, S., (1992). Interactions, relationships, and bonds: the conceptual basis for scientist-animal relations. In: Davis, H., Balfour, A.D. (Eds.), The Inevitable Bond-Examining Scientist- Animal Interactions (pp. 6-26). CAB International, Cambridge
  28. 28. Seabrook, M.F. (1972). A study to determine the influence of the herdsmans personality on milk yield. J Agric Labour Sci. 1, 45-59.
  29. 29. Hemsworth, P.H., Coleman, G.J. (1998). Human- Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom
  30. 30. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Coleman, G. (2002). The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stock people and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 79 (3): 195-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7
  31. 31. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Fölsch, D.W. (2003). Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 84 (1): 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5
  32. 32. Mattiello, S., Klotz, C., Baroli, D., Minero, M., Ferrante, V., Canali, E. (2009). Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital J Anim Sci. 8 (2s): 628-630.
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 51
Submitted on: Jul 18, 2014
Accepted on: Nov 10, 2014
Published on: Nov 18, 2015
Published by: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2015 Miroslav Radeski, Aleksandar Janevski, Vlatko Ilieski, published by Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.